Improvement of McCullagh-Barreto key agreement with KCI-security

doi:10.1016/S1005-8885(08)60205-8

中国邮电高校学报(英文) ›› 2009, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (2): 68-71.doi: 10.1016/S1005-8885(08)60205-8

• Information Security • 上一篇下一篇

Improvement of McCullagh-Barreto key agreement with KCI-security

汪小芬,DONG Qing-kuan, 周宇,肖国镇

School of Computer Science and Engineering , University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 610054, China

收稿日期:1900-01-01 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2009-04-30
通讯作者: 汪小芬

Improvement of McCullagh-Barreto key agreement with KCI-security

WANG Xiao-fen, DONG Qing-kuan, ZHOU Yu, XIAO Guo-zhen

School of Computer Science and Engineering , University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 610054, China

Received:1900-01-01 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2009-04-30
Contact: WANG Xiao-fen

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

McCullagh-Barreto key agreement protocol and its variant achieve perfect forward security and key generation center (KGC) forward security, but provide no resistance to key compromise impersonation attack (KCI attack). In this paper, we give a formal treatment of key compromise impersonation (KCI) attack and define the security notion against it. Then an variant of McCullagh-Barreto protocol is presented with only one more Hash operation. The improved protocol preserves perfect forward security and KGC forward security, and furthermore is proved to be secure against KCI attack under k-Gap-BCAA1 assumption.

关键词:

authenticated;key;agreement,;key;compromise;impersonation;attack,;perfect;forward;security,;KGC;forward;security,;KCI-secure

Abstract:

Key words:

authenticated key agreement;key compromise impersonation attack;perfect forward security;KGC forward security;KCI-secure

WANG Xiao-fen, DONG Qing-kuan, ZHOU Yu, XIAO Guo-zhen. Improvement of McCullagh-Barreto key agreement with KCI-security[J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica(English letters), 2009, 16(2): 68-71.

参考文献

1. Shamir A. Identity-based cryptosystems and signature schemes. Proceedings of the 4th Annual International Cryptology Conference (Crypto’84). Aug 19-22, 1984, Santa Barbara, CA, USA. LNCS 196. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag, 1985: 47-53

2. Boneh D, Franklin M K. Identity based encryption from the Weil pairing. Proceedings of the 21st Annual International Cryptology Conference (Crypto’ 01), Aug 19-23, 2001, Santa Barbara, CA, USA. LNCS 2139. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag, 2001: 213-229

3. Smart N P. An identity based authenticated key agreement protocol based on the Weil pairing. Electronics Letters, 2002, 38(13): 630-632

4. Chen L, Kudla C. Identity based authenticated key agreement protocols from pairings. Proceedings of the 16th IEEE Computer Security Foundations Workshop, Jun 30-Jul 2, 2003, Pacific Grove, CA, USA. Piscataway, NJ, USA: IEEE, 2003: 219-233

5. Chen L, Cheng Z, Smart N P. Identity-based key agreement protocols from pairings. International Journal of Information Security, 2007, 6(4): 213-241

6. Cheng Z H, Chen L Q, Comley R, et al. Identity-based key agreement with unilateral identity privacy using pairings. Proceedings of Information Security Practice and Experience 2006, Apr 11-14, 2006, Hangzhou, China. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer-Verlag, 2006: 202-213

7. Kasahara M. ID based cryptosystems with pairing on elliptic curve. Proceedings of the 2003 Symposium on Cryptography and Information Security (SCIS’ 03), Mar 25, 2003, Hamamatsu, Japan. 2003: 265-273

8. McCullagh N, Barreto P S L M. A new two-party identity-based authenticated key agreement. Proceedings of Topics in Cryptology

(CT-RSA’05), Feb 14-18, 2005, San Francisco, CA, USA. LNCS 3376. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag, 2005: 262-274

9. Cheng Z H, Chen L Q. On security proof of McCullagh-Barreto’s key agreement protocol and its variants. International Journal of Security and Networks, 2007, 2(3): 251-259

10. Blake-Wilson S, Johnson D, Menezes A. Key agreement protocols and their security analysis. Proceedings of the 6th IMA International Conference on Cryptography and Coding (IMA’97), Dec 17-19, 1997, Cirencester, UK. LNCS 1355. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag, 1997: 30-45

11. Bellare M, Rogaway P. Entity authentication and key distribution. Proceeding of the 13th Annual International Cryptology Conference (Crypto’93), Aug 22-26, 1993, Santa Barbara, CA, USA. LNCS 773. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag, 1993: 232-249

[1]	梁晓林, 刘千龙, 曹旺斌, 刘帅奇, 赵淑欢, 赵雄文. Fairness optimization and power allocation in cognitive NOMA / OMA V2V network with imperfect SIC [J]. 中国邮电高校学报(英文版), 2023, 30(6): 68-81.
[2]	孟慧任利娜赵宗渠. Identity-based proxy re-encryption scheme from RLWE assumption with ciphertext evolution[J]. 中国邮电高校学报(英文版), 2023, 30(5): 51-60.
[3]	Luo Zhiyong, Wang Shuyi, Song Weiwei, Liu Jiahui, Wang Jianming. Research on security situation awareness algorithm of Markov differential game block-chain model[J]. 中国邮电高校学报(英文版), 2023, 30(4): 105-120.
[4]	周由胜黄妙刘媛妮陈自刚. Dynamic multi-keyword fuzzy ranked search with leakage resilience over encrypted cloud data[J]. 中国邮电高校学报(英文版), 2023, 30(2): 83-95.
[5]	He Yefeng, Yue Yuru, Li Guoqing, Liu Jixiang, Di Man, Pang Yibo. New controlled quantum key agreement protocols based on Bell states[J]. 中国邮电高校学报(英文版), 2022, 29(4): 42-50.
[6]	Han Yushan, Che Bichen, Liu Jiali, Dou Zhao, Di Junyu. Nearly universal and efficient quantum secure multi-party computation protocol[J]. 中国邮电高校学报(英文版), 2022, 29(4): 51-68.
[7]	Song Xin, Huang Xue, Gao Yiming, Qian Haijun. Energy-efficient power allocation for NOMA heterogeneous networks with imperfect CSI[J]. 中国邮电高校学报(英文版), 2022, 29(1): 102-112.
[8]	刘巧唐碧华 Chen Xue Fan Wu 范文浩. Multi-level sharded blockchain system for edge computing [J]. 中国邮电高校学报(英文版), 2021, 28(5): 46-58.
[9]	Wang Yiting, Ba Xiaohui, Liu Xueyong, Yang Ying, Li Jian, Chen Jie. Tracking structure suitable for L6 signal[J]. 中国邮电高校学报(英文版), 2021, 28(4): 64-74.
[10]	赵国生刘冬梅王健. Cloud security situation prediction method based on grey wolf optimization and BP neural network [J]. 中国邮电高校学报(英文版), 2020, 27(6): 30-41.
[11]	赵宗渠马少提王永军汤永利叶青. Two-factor ( biometric and password) authentication key exchange on lattice based on key consensus [J]. 中国邮电高校学报(英文版), 2020, 27(6): 42-53.
[12]	刘琨, 王辉, 申自浩. Prediction of network attack profit path based on NAPG model[J]. 中国邮电高校学报(英文版), 2020, 27(5): 91-102.
[13]	林杰刘川意方滨兴. VMScan: an out-of-VM malware scanner [J]. 中国邮电高校学报(英文版), 2020, 27(4): 59-68.
[14]	杨亚涛张卷美黄洁润张亚泽. Improved authenticated key agreement protocol based on Bi-ISIS problem[J]. 中国邮电高校学报(英文版), 2020, 27(3): 93-102.
[15]	田世明宫飞翔莫爽李蒙吴文睿肖丁. End-to-end encrypted network traffic classification method based on deep learning[J]. 中国邮电高校学报(英文版), 2020, 27(3): 21-30.

Improvement of McCullagh-Barreto key agreement with KCI-security

Improvement of McCullagh-Barreto key agreement with KCI-security

PDF

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价