1. Padmanabhan V N, Wang H J, Chou P A. Resilient peer-to-peer streaming. Proceedings of the 11st IEEE International Conference on Network Protocol (ICNP’03), Nov 4-7, 2003, Atlanta, GA, USA. Los Alamitos, CA, USA: IEEE Computer Society, 2003: 16-27
2. Castro M, Druschel P, Kermarrec A M, et al. SplitStream: high-bandwidth multicast in a cooperative environment. Proceedings of the 19th ACM SIGOPS Symposium on Operating Systems Principles (SOSP’03), Oct 19-22, 2003, Bolton Landing, NY, USA. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2003: 298-313
3. Pai V, Kumar K, Tamilmani K, et al. Chainsaw: eliminating trees from overlay multicast. Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Peer-to-Peer Systems (IPTPS’05), Feb 24-25, 2005, Ithaca, NY, USA. LNCS 3640. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag, 2005: 127-140
4. Zhang X Y, Liu J C, Li B, et al. CoolStreaming/Donet: a data-driven overlay network for peer-to-peer live media streaming. Proceedings of the 24th Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (INFOCOM’05): Vol 2, Mar 13-17, 2005, Miami, FL, USA. Piscataway, NJ, USA: IEEE, 2005: 2102-2111
5. Magharei N, Rejaie R, Guo Y. Mesh or multiple-tree: a comparative study of live P2P streaming approaches. Proceedings of the 26th IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications (INFOCOM’07), Mar 6-12, 2007,Anchorage, AK, USA. Piscataway, NJ, USA: IEEE, 2007: 1424-1432
6. Huang Y, Fu T Z J, Chiu D M, et al. Challenges, design and analysis of a large-scale P2P-VoD system. Proceedings of Conference on Applications, Technologies, Architectures, and Protocols for Computer Communications (SIGCOMM’08), Aug 17-22, 2008, Seattle, WA, USA. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2008: 375-388
7. Magharei N, Rejaie R. PRIME: peer-to-peer receiver-driven mesh-based streaming. Proceedings of the 26th IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications (INFOCOM’07), Mar 6-12, 2007,Anchorage, AK,USA. Piscataway, NJ, USA: IEEE 2007: 1415-1423
8. Vlavianos A, Iliofotou M, Faloutsos M. BiTos: enhancing BitTorrent for supporting streaming applications. Proceedings of the 25th IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications (INFOCOM’06), Apr 23-29, 2006, Barcelona, Spain. Piscataway, NJ, USA: IEEE, 2006: 6p
9. Zhou Y P, Chiu D M, Lui J C S. A simple model for analyzing P2P streaming protocols. Proceedings of the 15th IEEE International International Conference on Network Protocols (ICNP’07), Oct 16-19, 2007, Beijing, China. Piscataway, NJ, USA: IEEE, 2007: 226-235
10. Zhang M, Zhang Q, Sun L F, et al. Understanding the power of pull-based streaming protocol: can we do better? IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 2007, 25(9), 1678-1694
11. Liang C, Guo Y, Liu Y. Is random scheduling sufficient in P2P video streaming?. Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems (ICDCS’08), Jun 17-20, 2008, Beijing, China. Piscataway, NJ, USA: IEEE, 2008: 53-60
12. Cohen B. Incentives build robustness in BitTorrent. Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Economics of Peer-to-Peer Systems (P2PEcon’03): Vol 6, Jun 5-6, 2003, Berkeley, CA, USA. LNCS 2735. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag, 2003: 102-111
13. Bharambe A R, Herley C, Padmanabhan V N. Analyzing and improving a BitTorrent networks performance mechanisms. Proceedings of the 25th IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications (INFOCOM’06), Apr 23-29, 2006, Barcelona, Spain. Piscataway, NJ, USA: EEE, 2006: 12p
14. Legout A, Urvoy-Keller G, Michiardi P. Rarest first and choke algorithms are enough. Proceedings of the 6th ACM SIGCOMM on Internet measurement Conference (IMC’06), Oct 25-27, 2006, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2006: 203-216
15. Mol J D. P2P video streaming with tribler [2008]. http://www.tribler.org/ attachment/wiki/ TriblerCourse/jandavid.pdf
16. Abramson N. The ALOHA system: another alternative for computer communications. Proceedings of Fall Joint Computer Conference Proceedings (AFIPS’70), Nov 17-19, 1970, Houston, TX, USA. Reston, VA, USA: AFIPS Press, 1970: 281-285
17. Yang X, Veciana G D. Service capacity of peer to peer networks. Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (INFOCOM’04): Vol 4, Mar 7-11, 2004, Hong Kong, China. Piscataway, NJ, USA: IEEE, 2004: 2242-2252
18. Xu D G, Chai H K, Rosenberg C, et al. Analysis of a hybrid architecture for cost-effective streaming media distribution. Proceedings of SPIE/ACM Conference on Multimedia Computing and Networking (MMCN’03), Jan 23-24, 2003, San Jose, CA, USA. 2003
19. Tu Y C, Sun J Z, Prabhakar S. Performance analysis of a hybrid media streaming system. Proceedings of SPIE/ACM Conference on Multimedia Computing and Networking (MMCN’04), Jan 21-22, 2004, San Jose, CA, USA. 2004
20. Lou D F, Mao Y Y, Yeap T H. The production of peer-to-peer video-streaming networks. Proceedings of Conference on Applications, Technologies, Architectures, and Protocols for Computer Communications (SIGCOMM’2007), Aug 27-31, 2007, Kyoto, Japan. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2007: 346-351
21. Kumar R, Liu Y, Ross K W. Stochastic fluid theory for P2P streaming systems. Proceedings of the 26th IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications (INFOCOM’07), Mar 6-12, 2007,Anchorage, AK, USA. Piscataway, NJ, USA: IEEE, 2007: 919-927
22. Hei X J, Liang C, Liang J, et al. A measurement study of a large scale P2P IPTV system, IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 2007, 9(8): 1672-1687
23. Chen Y S, Chen C J, Li C X. Measure and model P2P streaming system by buffer bitmap. Proceedings of the 10th IEEE International Conference on High Performance Computing and Communications (HPCC’08), Sep 25-27, 2008, Dalian, Beijing. Piscataway, NJ, USA: IEEE, 2008: 242-249 |