中国邮电高校学报(英文版) ›› 2016, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (4): 77-82.doi: 10.1016/S1005-8885(16)60048-1
摘要： Objective video quality assessment methods often evaluate all the frames regardless of their importance. For wireless distorted videos, not every frame has the same contribution to the final overall quality due to the channel fading and interference, which may lead to the capacity variation in temporal. Besides, with the content similarity and error propagation pattern in temporal domain, it is possible to evaluate the overall quality with only part of the frames. In this paper, a demonstration is performed to show that the video quality can be evaluated with reduced frames set (RFS), and a state transition model is proposed to extract the RFS. At last, a video quality assessment (VQA) method is carried out based on RFS. Compared with several state-of-the-art methods, our method can achieve a suitable accuracy with less frames to be processed.
|1. Jia Y T, Lin W, Kassim A A. Estimating just-noticeable distortion for video. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and System for Video Technology, 2006, 16(7): 820?829 2. Moorthy A K, Seshadrinathan K, Soundararajan R, et al. Wireless video quality assessment: a study of subjective scores and objective algorithms. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and System for Video Technology, 2010, 20(4): 587?599 3. Chen Z F, Wu D P. Prediction of transmission distortion for wireless video communication: analysis. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2012, 21(3): 1123?1137 4. Seshadrinathan K, Soundararajan R, Bovik A C, et al. Study of subjective and objective quality assessment of video. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2010, 19(6): 1427?1441 5. Seshadrinathan K, Bovik A C. Temporal hysteresis model of time varying subjective video quality. Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Process (ICASSP’11), May 22?27, 2011, Prague, Czech. Piscataway, NJ, USA: IEEE, 2011: 1153?1156 6. Barkowsky M, Eskofier B, Bitto R, et al. Perceptually motivated spatial and temporal integration of pixel based video quality measures. Proceedings of the International Conference on Heterogeneous Networking for Quality, Reliability, Security and Robustness (QShine'07), Aug 14?17, Vancouver, Canada. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2007 7. Tan KT, Ghanbari M, Pearson D E. An objective measurement tool for mpeg video quality. Signal Processing, 1998, 70(3): 279?294 8. Masry M A, Hemami S S. A metric for continuous quality evaluation of compressed video with severe distortions. Signal Processing: Image Communication, 2004, 19(2): 133?146 9. Barakovi? S, Skorin-Kapov L. Survey and challenges of QoE management issues in wireless networks. Journal of Computer Networks and Communications, 2013, Article 165146/1-28 10. Pappas T N , Neuhoff D L, de Ridder H, et al. Image analysis: focus on texture similarity. Proceeding of the IEEE, 2013, 101(9): 2044?2057 11. Seshadrinathan K, Bovik A C. Motion tuned spatio-temporal quality assessment of natural videos. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2010, 19(2): 335?350 12. Wang Z, Bovik A C, Sheikh H R, et al. Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2004, 13(4): 600?612 13. Sheikh H R, Bovik A C. Image information and visual quality. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2006, 15(2): 430?444 14. Jayant N, Johnston J, Safranek R. Signal compression based on models of human perception. Proceeding of the IEEE, 1993, 81(10): 1385?1422 15. Bhat A, Kannangara S, Zhao Y F, et al. A full reference quality metric for compressed video based on mean squared error and video content. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and System for Video Technology, 2012, 22(2): 165?173 16. Yang F Z, Song J R, Wan S, et al, Content-adaptive packet-layer model for quality assessment of networked video services. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics on Signal Processing, 2012, 6(6): 672?683 17. Mittal A, Soundararajan R, Bovik A C. Making a “completely blind” image quality analyzer. IEEE Signal Processing Letters, 2013, 20(3): 209?212 18. Reichl P, Egger S, Schatz R, et al. The logarithmic nature of QoE and the role of the Weber-Fechner law in QoE assessment. Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC’10), May 23?27, Cape Town, South Africa. Piscataway, NJ, USA: IEEE, 2010: 5p 19. Vu P V, Vu C T, Chandler D M. A spatiotemporal most-apparent-distortion model for video quality assessment. Proceedings of the 18th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, Sept 11?14, 2011, Brussels, Belgium. Piscataway, NJ, USA: IEEE, 2011: 2505?2508 20. Pinson M H, Wolf S. A new standardized method for objectively measuring video quality. IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting, 2004, 50(3): 312?322 21. Soundararajan R, Bovik A C. Video quality assessment by reduced reference spatio-temporal entropic differencing. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and System for Video Technology, 2013, 23(4): 684?694 22. Sheikh H R, Sabir M F, Bovik A C. A statistical evaluation of recent full reference image quality assessment algorithms. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2006, 15(11): 3440?3451|
|No related articles found!|