中国邮电高校学报(英文版) ›› 2022, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (2): 43-51.doi: 10. 19682/ j. cnki. 1005-8885. 2022. 0015
• Special Topic: Cultural Computing • 上一篇 下一篇
An Avatar-like robot in a virtual museum environment was designed to perform the function of telepresence and teleoperation, and make the three-dimensional (3D) effect through a binocular camera and a virtual reality (VR) head-mounted display (HMD). This robot supports users to participate in the exhibition remotely in a new and interactive way in multiple scenarios. The results show that the system has good usability and is worth further optimizing.
 STAHL C, ANASTASIOU D, LATOUR T. Social telepresence robots: the role of gesture for collaboration over a distance. Proceedings of the 11th Pervasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments Conference ( PETRA’18), 2018, Jun 26 - 29, Corfu, Greece. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2018: 409 -414.
 MATSUDA A, MIYAKI T, REKIMOTO J. ScalableBody: a telepresence robot that supports face position matching using a vertical actuator. Proceedings of the 8th Augmented Human International Conference (AH’17), 2017, Mar 16 - 18, Silicon Valley, CA, USA. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2017: Artic 13.
 NAKANISHI J, ITADERA S, AOYAMA T, et al. Towards the development of an intuitive teleoperation system for human support robot using a VR device. Journal of Advanced Robotics, 2020, 34(19): 1239 -1253.
 TSUI K M, NORTON A, BROOKS D J, et al. Design and development of two generations of semi-autonomous social
telepresence robots. Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE Conference on Technologies for Practical Robot Applications ( TePRA’13 ), 2013, Apr 22 -23, Woburn, MA, USA. Piscataway, NJ, USA: IEEE, 2013: 1 -6.
 BOTEV J, RODRÍGUEZ LERA F J. Immersive robotic telepresence for remote educational scenarios. Sustainability,
2021, 13(9): 4717.
 INUKAI M, YASHIRO D, YUBAI K, et al. Design of adaptive controller for bilateral control systems including a propeller-driven system. Proceedings of the 46th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society (IECON’20), 2020, Oct 18 - 21, Singapore. Piscataway, NJ, USA: IEEE, 2020: 148 -153.
 JOHNSTON A P R, RAE J, ARIOTTI N, et al. Journey to the centre of the cell: virtual reality immersion into scientific data. Traffic, 2018, 19(2): 105 -110.
 TSUI K M, YANCO H A. Design challenges and guidelines for social interaction using mobile telepresence robots. Reviews of Human Factors and Ergonomics, 2013, 9(1): 227 -301.
 NEWHART V A, WARSCHAUER M, SENDER L S. Virtual inclusion via telepresence robots in the classroom: an exploratory case study. International Journal of Technologies in Learning, 2016, 23(4): 9 -25.
 OKAMURA E, TANAKA F. A pilot study about remote teaching by elderly people to children over a two-way telepresence robot system. Proceedings of the 11th ACM/ IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI’16), 2016, Mar 7 - 10, Christchurch, New Zealand. Piscataway, NJ, USA: IEEE, 2016: 489 -490.
 YANG L L, JONES B, NEUSTAEDTER C, et al. Shopping over distance through a telepresence robot. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 2018, 2: Article 191.
 YOUSIF J H. Social and Telepresence Robots a future of teaching. Artificial Intelligence & Robotics Development Journal, 2021, 1(1): 58 -65.
 NIELSEN J. Usability inspection methods. Proceedings of the 1994 Conference Companion on Human factors in Computing Systems (CHI’94), 1994, Apr 24 -28, Boston, MA, USA. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 1994: 413 -414.
 NIELSEN J, MOLICH R. Heuristic evaluation of user interfaces. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, 1990, Apr 1 - 5, Seattle, USA. NewYork, NY, USA: ACM, 1990: 249 -256.
|No related articles found!|