Energy efficient data collection in UAV-assisted Internet of things: trajectory planning and aerodynamic-based attitude control

doi:10.19682/j.cnki.1005-8885.2021.0024

中国邮电高校学报(英文) ›› 2022, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (2): 97-107.doi: 10.19682/j.cnki.1005-8885.2021.0024

Energy efficient data collection in UAV-assisted Internet of things: trajectory planning and aerodynamic-based attitude control

王世宇,陈浩,胡楠,贾泽坤

北京邮电大学信息与通信工程

收稿日期:2021-01-31 修回日期:2021-04-01 出版日期:2022-04-26 发布日期:2022-04-26
通讯作者: 陈浩 E-mail:2020110229@bupt.edu.cn
基金资助:
This work was supported by the National Science Foundation for Young Scientists of China Project (61801045), and the Beijing Natural Science Foundation (L192033).

Energy efficient data collection in UAV-assisted Internet of things: trajectory planning and aerodynamic-based attitude control

Received:2021-01-31 Revised:2021-04-01 Online:2022-04-26 Published:2022-04-26
Supported by:
This work was supported by the National Science Foundation for Young Scientists of China Project (61801045), and the Beijing Natural Science Foundation (L192033).

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

Due to its inherent characteristics of flexible mobility, unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) is exploited as a cost-efficient mobile platform to assist remote data collection in the 5th generation or beyond the 5th generation (5G/ B5G) wireless systems. Compared with static terrestrial base stations, the line-of-sight (LoS) link between UAVs and ground nodes are stronger due to their flexibility in three-dimensional (3D) space. Due to the fact that flexible mobility of UAVs requires high propulsion power, the limited on-board energy constrains the performance of UAV-assisted data collection. It is worth noting that UAVs can be categorized into rotary-wing UAVs and fixed-wing UAVs, either has its own characteristics in propulsion energy consumption. In this article, a comprehensive review of state-of-art studies on trajectory design schemes for rotary-wing UAVs, as well as aerodynamic-aware attitude control strategies for fixed-wing UAVs was provided. Then, two case studies for energy-efficient data collection using rotary-wing UAVs and fixed-wing UAVs were presented, respectively. More specifically, an age-energy aware data collection scheme was demonstrated for rotary-wing UAVs to optimize the timeliness of collected data. Moreover, an aerodynamic-aware attitude control strategy for fixed-wing UAVs was also demonstrated under data collection requirements.

关键词: unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV), path planning, wireless communication network, data collection

Abstract:

Key words: unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV), path planning, wireless communication network, data collection

中图分类号:

','1');return false;" target="_blank"> ">

参考文献

[1] SAMBO Y A, KLAINE V, NADAS J P B, et al. Energy minimization UAV trajectory design for delay-tolerant emergency communication. Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE International Conference on Communications Workshops (ICC Workshops’19), May 22 - 24, Shanghai, China. Piscataway, NJ, USA: IEEE, 2019: 1 -6.

[2] SAMIR M, SHARAFEDDINE S, ASSI C M, et al. UAV trajectory planning for data collection from time-constrained IoT

devices. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 2020, 19(1): 34 -46.

[3] YANG S Z, DENG Y S, TANG X X, et al. Energy efficiency optimization for UAV-assisted backscatter communications. IEEE Communications Letters, 2019, 23(11): 2041 -2045.

[4] WANG Z J, LIU R K, LIU Q R, et al. Energy-efficient data collection and device positioning in UAV-assisted IoT. IEEE

Internet of Things Journal, 2020, 7(2): 1122 -1139.

[5] LI B, CHEN C, ZHANG R N, et al. The energy-efficient UAV-based BS coverage in air-to-ground communications. Proceedings of the IEEE 10th Sensor Array and Multichannel Signal Processing Workshop ( SAM’18 ), Jul 8 - 11, 2018, Sheffield, UK. Piscataway, NJ, USA: IEEE, 2018: 578 -581.

[6] RUAN L, WANG J L, CHEN J, et al. Energy-efficient multi-UAV coverage deployment in UAV networks: a game-theoretic framework. China Communications, 2018, 15(10): 194 -209.

[7] ZHU K Y, XU X D, HAN S J. Energy-efficient UAV trajectory planning for data collection and computation in mMTC networks. Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE Globecom Workshops ( GC Wkshps’18), Dec 9 - 13, 2018, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates. Piscataway, NJ, USA: IEEE, 2018: 1 -6.

[8] ZHAN C, ZENG Y. Completion time minimization for multi-UAV-enabled data collection. IEEE Transactions on actions Wireless Communications, 2019, 18(10): 4859 -4872.

[9] ZONG J Y, SHEN C, CHENG J, et al. Flight time minimization via UAV’s trajectory design for ground sensor data collection. Proceedings of the 16th International Symposium on Wireless Communication Systems (ISWCS’19), Aug 27 -30, 2019, Oulu, Finland. Piscataway, NJ, USA: IEEE, 2019: 255 -259.

[10] LI J X, ZHAO H T, WANG H J, et al. Joint optimization on trajectory, altitude, velocity, and link scheduling for minimum mission time in UAV-aided data collection. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 2020, 7(2): 1464 -1475.

[11] GONG J, CHANG T H, SHEN C, et al. Flight time minimization of UAV for data collection over wireless sensor networks. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 2018, 36 (9): 1942 -1954.

[12] GONG J, CHANG T H, SHEN C, et al. Aviation time minimization of UAV for data collection from energy constrained sensor networks. Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference ( WCNC’18), Apr 15 -18, 2018, Barcelona, Spain. Piscataway, NJ, USA: IEEE, 2018: 1 -6.

[13] TONG P, LIU J, WANG X J, BAI B, et al. UAV-enabled age-optimal data collection in wireless sensor networks. Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE International Conference on Communications Workshops (ICC Workshops’19), May 20 -24, 2019, Shanghai, China. Piscataway, NJ, USA: IEEE, 2019: 1 -6.

[14] LIU J, WANG X J, BAI B, et al. Age-optimal trajectory planning for UAV-assisted data collection. Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE Conference on Computer Communications Workshops (INFOCOM WKSHPS’18), Apr 15 - 19, 2018, Honolulu, HI, USA. Piscataway, NJ, USA: IEEE, 2018: 553 -558.

[15] ZENG Y, ZHANG R. Energy-efficient UAV communication with trajectory optimization. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 2017 16(6): 3747 -3760.

[16] LAWRANCE N R J, SUKKARIEH S. A guidance and control strategy for dynamic soaring with a gliding UAV. Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, May 12 -17, 2009, Kobe, Japan. Piscataway, NJ, USA: IEEE, 2009: 3632 -3637.

[17] LAWRANCE N R J, SUKKARIEH S. Path planning for autonomous soaring flight in dynamic wind fields. Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, May 9 -13, 2011, Shanghai, China. Piscataway, NJ, USA: IEEE, 2011: 2499 -2505.

[18] LAWRANCE N R J, SUKKARIEH S. Simultaneous exploration and exploitation of a wind field for a small gliding UAV. Proceedings of the AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference 2010, Aug 2 - 5, 2010, Toronto, Canada. Reston, VA, USA: AIAA, 2010: 1 -22.

[19] PARK S Y, JEONG D, SHIN C S, et al. DroneNet + : adaptive route recovery using path stitching of UAVs in ad-hoc networks. Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM’17), Dec 4 - 8, 2017, Singapore. Piscataway, NJ, USA: IEEE, 2017: 1 -7.

[20] WANG Q, CHEN Z, LI H. Energy-efficient trajectory planning for UAV-aided secure communication. China Communications, 2018, 15(5): 51 -60.

[21] ZHAN C, ZENG Y, ZHANG R. Energy-efficient data collection in UAV enabled wireless sensor network. IEEE Wireless Communications Letters, 2018, 7(3): 328 -331.

[22] YANG D C, WU Q Q, ZENG Y, et al. Energy tradeoff in ground-to-UAV communication via trajectory design. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 2018, 67(7): 6721 -6726.

[23] CHAKARESKI J, NAQVI S, MASTRONARDE S, et al. An energy efficient framework for UAV-assisted millimeter wave 5G heterogeneous cellular networks. IEEE Transactions on Green Communications and Networking, 2019, 3(1): 37 -44.

[24] WU Q Q, ZENG Y, ZHANG R. Joint trajectory and communication design for multi-UAV enabled wireless networks.

IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 2018, 17(3): 2109 -2121.

[25] WU F H, YANG D C, XIAO L, et al. Energy consumption and completion time tradeoff in rotary-wing UAV enabled WPCN. IEEE Access, 2019, 7: 79617 -79635.

[26] XU J, ZENG Y, ZHANG R. UAV-enabled wireless power transfer: trajectory design and energy region characterization. Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE Globecom Workshops ( GC Wkshps’17), Dec 4 - 8, 2017, Singapore. Piscataway, NJ, USA: IEEE, 2017: 1 -7.

[27] XU J, ZENG Y, ZHANG R. UAV-enabled multiuser wireless power transfer: trajectory design and energy optimization. Proceedings of the 23rd Asia-Pacific Conference on Communications ( APCC’17 ), Dec 11 - 13, 2017, Perth, Australia. Piscataway, NJ, USA: IEEE, 2017: 1 -6.

[28] RUCCO A, AGUIAR A P, PEREIRA F L, et al. A moving path following approach for trajectory optimization of UAVs: an application for target tracking of marine vehicles. Proceedings of the 2016 European Control Conference (ECC’16), Jun 29 - Jul 1, 2016, Aalborg, Denmark. Piscataway, NJ, USA: IEEE, 2016: 1297 -1302.

[29] ELLOUMI M, ESCRIG B, DHAOU R, et al. Designing an energy efficient UAV tracking algorithm. Proceedings of the 13th International Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing Conference (IWCMC’17), Jun 26 -30, 2017, Valencia, Spain. Piscataway, NJ, USA: IEEE, 2017: 127 -132.

[30] NGUYEN J, LAWRANCE N, FITCH R, et al. Energy-constrained motion planning for information gathering with autonomous aerial soaring. Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, May 6 - 10, 2013, Karlsruhe, Germany. Piscataway, NJ, USA: IEEE, 2013: 3825 -3831.

[31] LI R, CHEN M. Flight control law evaluation for UAV based on simulated annealing algorithm. Proceedings of the 32nd Chinese Control Conference, Jul 26 - 28, 2013, Xi’an, China. 2013: 8697 -8702 (in Chinese).

[32] PENG Z H, SUN L, CHEN J, et al. Path planning of multiple UAVs low-altitude penetration based on improved multi-agent coevolutionary algorithm. Proceedings of the 30th Chinese Control Conference, Jul 22 -24, 2011, Yantai, China. Piscataway, NJ, USA: IEEE, 2011: 4056 -4061.

[33] ZHANG J W, ZENG Y, ZHANG R. Spectrum and energy efficiency maximization in UAV-enabled mobile relaying.

Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC’17), May 21 - 25, 2017, Paris, France.

Piscataway, NJ, USA: IEEE, 2017: 1 -6.

[34] ALLEN M J. Autonomous soaring for improved endurance of a small uninhabited air vehicle. Proceedings of the 43rd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Jun 10 - 13, 2005, Reno, NV, USA. Reston, VA, USA: AIAA, 2005: 1 -3.

[35] ANTAL C, GRANICHIN O, LEVI S. Adaptive autonomous soaring of multiple UAVs using simultaneous perturbation stochastic approximation. Proceedings of the 49th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control ( CDC’10), Dec 15 - 17, 2010, Atlanta, GA, USA. Piscataway, NJ, USA: IEEE, 2010: 3656 -3661.

[36] DEPENBUSCH N T , LANGELAAN J W. Coordinated mapping and exploration for autonomous soaring. Proceedings of the 2011 AIAA Infotech, Mar 29 - 31, 2011, St Louis, MO, USA. Reston, VA, USA: AIAA, 2011: 1 -18.

[37] COBANO J A, ALEJO D, VERA S, et al. Multiple gliding UAV coordination for static soaring in real time applications.

Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, May 6 - 10, 2013, Karlsruhe, Germany. Piscataway, NJ, USA: IEEE, 2013: 790 -795.

[38] LIU Y Y, LONGO S, KERRIGAN E C. Nonlinear predictive control of autonomous soaring UAVs using 3DOF models.

Proceedings of the 2013 European Control Conference (ECC’13), Jul 17 - 19, 2013, Zurich, Switzerland. Piscataway, NJ, USA: IEEE, 2013: 1365 -1370.

[39] COBANO J A, ALEJO D, SUKKARIEH S, et al. Thermal detection and generation of collision-free trajectories for cooperative soaring UAVs. Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE/ RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Nov 3 - 7, 2013, Tokyo, Japan. Piscataway, NJ, USA: IEEE, 2013: 2948 - 2954.

[40] CHAKRABARTY A, LANGELAAN J W. Energy-based long- range path planning for soaring-capable unmanned aerial vehicles. Journal of Guidance Control and Dynamics, 2011, 34(4): 1002 -1015.

[41] BOSLOUGH M. Autonomous dynamic soaring. Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE Aerospace Conference, Mar 4 - 11, 2017, Big Sky, MT, USA. Piscataway, NJ, USA: IEEE, 2017: 1 -20.

[42] KIRKPATRICK S. Optimization by simulated annealing: quantitative studies. Journal of statistical physics, 1984, 34(5/6): 975 -986.

[43] JIA Z K, QIN X Q, WANG Z J, et al. Age-based path planning and data acquisition in UAV-assisted IoT networks. Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE International Conference on Communications Workshops (ICC Workshops’19), May 20 -24, 2019, Shanghai, China. Piscataway, NJ, USA: IEEE, 2019: 1 -6.

[44] KAUL S,YATES R, GRUTESER M. Real-time status: how often should one update? Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE INFOCOM, Mar 25 - 30, 2012, Orlando, FL, USA. Piscataway, NJ, USA: IEEE, 2012: 2731 -2735.

Energy efficient data collection in UAV-assisted Internet of things: trajectory planning and aerodynamic-based attitude control

Energy efficient data collection in UAV-assisted Internet of things: trajectory planning and aerodynamic-based attitude control

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 0

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价